in

Chinese Authorities Are Suspended For Allegedly Ignoring A Baby Abduction.

Chinese Authorities Are Suspended For Allegedly Ignoring A Baby Abduction.
Chinese Authorities Are Suspended For Allegedly Ignoring A Baby Abduction.
Chinese Authorities Are Suspended For Allegedly Ignoring A Baby Abduction.
Chinese Authorities Are Suspended For Allegedly Ignoring A Baby Abduction.

For allegedly “ignoring” the case of a baby boy who was purported kidnapped from his parents by local officials in the 1990s, China has suspended two health officials in a southern country, in order words the Chinese Authorities Are Suspended For Allegedly Ignoring A Baby Abduction.

 

His parents have requested an investigation from the police in Guangxi province.

He was taken away as a result of “social reallocation” under China’s previous one-child policy, according to a local health bureau, which declined to investigate the issue.

On social media, the case has incited fury toward the government. The one-child policy’s severe guidelines at the time drew criticism online from many, who labeled the situation as “a plain case of human trafficking.”

It also follows recent reports about a Chinese mother who was captured on camera being imprisoned in a village hut, which raised debate about human trafficking in China’s rural areas.

Isn’t this considered human trafficking?

A letter from the Quanzhou country local health bureau went viral earlier this week on Chinese social media. The letter was made in response to a request from a couple to begin an inquiry into the possible abduction of their seventh child in the 1990s.

The couple who went by their surnames Tang and Deng requested that authorities investigate a group of former local officials

The parents reportedly told local media sites that they had never given up seeking their child and that they had filed several complaints with various government agencies.

The local health bureau responded on July 1 and stated that no inquiry would be launched because the youngest has not been kidnapped but rather taken away by the authorities for “social reallocation.”

According to state-run media outlet the Global Times, the authority also said there was no record of “whereabouts of children who were reallocated for the convenience of family planning efforts pushed out across the country.”

The letter soon gained notoriety as many criticized the policy and called attention to the use of the phrase “social reallocation”.

picture

“What does social reallocation mean? This seems to be human trafficking” Someone enquired. Others gave personal accounts of how the now-abandoned one-child policy, which was implemented in 1979 to tame China’s explosive population growth, has impacted their families over the years.

Hu Xijin, a former editor in chief of the Global Times, was one of those who commented on the situation, criticizing the government’s use of “indifferent” language and how the incident has escalated into a “public catastrophe.”

The mother of the infant stated in an interview with the news outlet Caixin that the family had already paid fines to a local authority for having more than one child. She claims that in spite of this, her child was taken away.

The hashtag – #QuanzhouOverBornKidCaseBeenReportedtoGovernment received almost 60 million views as the case and the ensuing criticism was discussed ny millions online.

The Guilin People’s Government, u der which Quanzhou is governed, sent a letter on July 5 in which it claimed that the Quanzhou health bureau had “improperly handled a petition that sparked popular concern.

The director and deputy director of the health bureau will be suspended for disregarding the petition and for “administrative inaction,” they claimed, and a case investigation would be launched.

Families who had additional children were subject to severe fines and other penalties under the 1979 one-child policy, which was later replaced by the two-child policy.

In general, the government upheld the laws by fining those who broke them, making contraceptives publicly accessible, and rewarding those who followed them with money and jobs.

At times, more coercive techniques like mas sterilizations and forced abortions were also employed.

At least 16 children were taken into custody by family planning officials between 1999 and late 2006, according to a 2011 new York Time article.

According to the study, local government officials are allegedly utilizing the infants as a “source of cash,” frequently placing them up for adoption if their parents were unable to pay the penalties. How frequently placing them up for adoption if their parents were unable to pay the penalties. it’s unclear how widespread the official’s actions were.

On January 1st of this year, China abandoned its one-child policy in favor of a two-child policy in an effort to slow the sharp decrease in birth rates.

Couples are now permitted to have up to three children after that law was repealed in 2021, but these actions haven’t been able to stop the decline in the birth rate.

 

 

 

Avatar of Mercy Isidore

Written by Mercy Isidore

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

After Being Admitted To The Hospital, Travis Barker Receives Flowers From Kris Jenner And Corey Gamble.

After Being Admitted To The Hospital, Travis Barker Receives Flowers From Kris Jenner And Corey Gamble.

Update on Ukraine War: 7,200 Ukrainian Service Personnel's Are Missing - Ombudsman

Update on Ukraine War: 7,200 Ukrainian Service Personnel’s Are Missing – Ombudsman